Biz2Credit, Inc.

The FTC alleged that Biz2Credit advertised an average 10 to 14 business day turnaround on emergency PPP loan applications when processing actually took well over a month, and ignored requests to withdraw applications. It agreed to pay $33 million.

1Official action
$33MRedress ordered

Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.

Identity

Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.

Registrations
Biz2Credit, Inc., FTC v. (FTC federal court action, S.D.N.Y., 2024)
Jurisdictions
United States (federal)

A speed promise on a first come, first served program

Biz2Credit and its subsidiary Itria Ventures processed applications for the Paycheck Protection Program, the emergency COVID-19 lending scheme for small businesses. The company advertised that applications would be processed in an average of 10 to 14 business days.

According to the FTC’s complaint, the real average was more than double that, with tens of thousands of applicants waiting over two months for a final determination. The company knew about the delays and kept making the timing claim until nearly the end of the program.

Why the timing claim mattered so much

PPP loans were issued first come, first served. When the program exhausted its funds in May 2021 the government stopped accepting applications, so an applicant stuck in a queue was not inconvenienced, they were shut out. Some Biz2Credit applicants ended up with no funds at all.

The complaint also alleges the company ignored repeated and urgent requests to withdraw applications, which delayed and sometimes prevented those businesses from seeking PPP funds through another lender, and that the application process was designed to lock in as many applicants as possible before underwriting them.

The settlement

Biz2Credit agreed to pay $33 million in damages. The FTC described this and a parallel $26 million settlement with a separate company as the largest damages amounts it had ever secured under Section 19 of the FTC Act. The order also bars the company from misrepresenting loan application information or any material fact about a government benefit, and from refusing to let applicants withdraw promptly.

What is not established

The order is a settlement and resolves the allegations without any admission or finding of wrongdoing.

Sources

Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.

  1. Enforcement action March 18, 2024
    FTC Actions Against Companies Making Deceptive Pandemic Loan Promises Lead to Record $59 Million in Damages
  2. Enforcement action March 21, 2024
    Biz2Credit, Inc., FTC v.

Right of reply

No contact has been logged for this entry yet.

If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.

Other b2b services entries

See all b2b services entries, or browse the full record.


First recorded March 18, 2024 · Last updated March 21, 2024