D&S Marketing Solutions LLC
Also known as: US Corporate Compliance Office, Office of Compliance and Safety Standards, Occupational Safety and Compliance Administration.
The FTC alleged that D&S Marketing Solutions called new small businesses posing as OSHA, threatened shutdown or fines, and sold regulatory posters that agencies provide free. The operators were banned from selling such posters.
Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.
Identity
Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.
- Registrations
- FTC v. Sean K. Juhl and D&S Marketing Solutions LLC (FTC case 162-3022, M.D. Fla., 2016)
- Locations
- Florida
- Jurisdictions
- United States (federal) · Florida
Names chosen to sound like the government
Sean K. Juhl and D&S Marketing Solutions LLC called owners of newly opened small businesses while presenting themselves as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration or a similar agency. They used trading names built to sound official: “Occupational Safety and Compliance Administration,” “US Corporate Compliance Office” and “Office of Compliance and Safety Standards.”
Callers told owners they were not complying with federal law and that an inspection would shut down or fine the business unless they immediately bought regulatory posters, priced at $179.99 to $189.99.
Those posters are provided free by the agencies that require them. Buyers discovered afterwards that they had been dealing with a company, and those who called for a refund typically reached voicemail that was never returned.
The take and the order
The FTC alleged the operation bilked at least $1.3 million from newly opened small businesses. A federal court in Florida entered a temporary restraining order in June 2016.
The July 2017 settlement bans the defendants from selling such posters at all, and bars them from claiming affiliation with OSHA or any other agency, from claiming consumers are required by law to buy goods or services, and from misrepresenting any material fact. It imposes a judgment of more than $3.8 million, partially suspended on surrender of the defendants’ assets, which becomes due in full if they misrepresented their finances.
A second company, Grand Marketing Solutions LLC, is named in the settlement under two further trading names.
What is not established
The settlement resolves the allegations without any admission or finding of wrongdoing.
Sources
Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.
- Enforcement action June 21, 2016
- Enforcement action July 14, 2017
Right of reply
If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.
Other b2b services entries
See all b2b services entries, or browse the full record.
First recorded June 21, 2016 · Last updated July 14, 2017