Modern Technology Inc.
Also known as: Online Local Yellow Pages.
The FTC alleged that Modern Technology Inc. and related defendants billed small businesses and churches for unwanted online directory listings and used collection threats. A court entered a default judgment based on consumer losses.
Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.
Identity
Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.
- Registrations
- FTC v. Modern Technology Inc. (FTC case 132-3144, 2013)
- Locations
- Montreal
- Jurisdictions
- United States (federal)
Directory billing case ended with a default judgment and refunds
Modern Technology Inc., doing business as Online Local Yellow Pages, was one of 15 companies in a Montreal operation that sold online business directory listings. The FTC alleged that the defendants called small businesses and churches while pretending to verify information for existing listings or cancellation requests, even though they had no prior relationship with the consumers.
The defendants then sent bills averaging $499.99 or more. Some consumers paid because they believed someone in their organization had ordered a listing. The complaint alleged that the defendants used partial recordings of calls to claim that consumers had agreed to buy the listings. Those who refused to pay allegedly received collection notices, added charges, and threats of collection referrals, credit damage, or legal action. The 2013 release said the operation had generated more than 13,000 complaints and bilked more than $14 million.
In May 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a default judgment of more than $15.6 million, which the FTC said was based on consumers’ losses. The permanent injunction banned the defendants from the directory business and restricted misrepresentations, collection, and use of customer information.
In December 2015, the FTC reported mailing 774 checks totaling more than $444,000. The checks represented the full amounts paid by affected consumers, with an average payment of $574.66.
Sources
Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.
- Enforcement action November 19, 2013
- Enforcement action July 17, 2014
- Enforcement action December 4, 2015
Right of reply
If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.
Other marketing & creative entries
See all marketing & creative entries, or browse the full record.
First recorded November 19, 2013 · Last updated December 4, 2015