The Online Entrepreneur Inc.

Also known as: The Six Figure Program, Ben and Dave’s Program.

The FTC alleged that The Online Entrepreneur sold a $27 work-at-home website program using false income and money-back claims. Settlement orders banned the defendants from business opportunities and required one defendant to pay $259,394.

1Official action
$259KRedress ordered
3Business names used

Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.

Identity

Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.

Registrations
FTC v. The Online Entrepreneur Inc. (FTC case 122-3186, 2012)
Jurisdictions
United States (federal)

Work-at-home website program ends in settlement orders

The Online Entrepreneur Inc., also doing business as The Six Figure Program and Ben and Dave’s Program, sold a work-at-home opportunity based on affiliate marketing. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants said that a $27 fee would give consumers websites affiliated with well-known companies and allow them to earn commissions. The FTC alleged that consumers later learned they had to pay $100 or more in additional setup costs. The sweep release also says functioning websites did not produce the promised income of up to $15,000 per month or at least $15 within seven days, and that refund requests were often ignored.

A court halted the challenged practices, froze assets, and placed the companies into receivership. A March 2014 consent judgment permanently prohibited The Online Entrepreneur Inc., Ben and Dave’s Consulting Associates, Inc., and David Clabeaux from selling business and work-at-home opportunities. It imposed a judgment of more than $2.9 million that would be suspended when Clabeaux surrendered specified assets.

In July 2014, a final order resolved the case against Benjamin Moskel, the remaining defendant. That order imposed a judgment of more than $2.9 million, suspended after Moskel paid $259,394 and surrendered specified property. It also restricted his involvement with companies selling business or work-at-home opportunities.

What is not established

The releases describe FTC allegations and settlement orders. They do not state that the defendants admitted the allegations.

Sources

Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.

  1. Enforcement action November 15, 2012
    FTC Expands Fight Against Deceptive Business Opportunity Schemes
  2. Enforcement action March 20, 2014
    Defendants Behind ‘Online Entrepreneur’ Work-at-Home Scheme Settle FTC Charges
  3. Enforcement action August 6, 2014
    Defendant Behind ‘Six Figure Program’ Work-at-Home Scheme Settles FTC Charges

Right of reply

No contact has been logged for this entry yet.

If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.

Other coaching & business opportunity entries

See all coaching & business opportunity entries, or browse the full record.


First recorded November 15, 2012 · Last updated August 6, 2014