Publishing.com LLC
Also known as: Publishing.com.
Publishing.com and its two principals agreed in April 2026 to pay $1.5 million to settle FTC charges that they misled buyers about how much they were likely to earn using the company's products. The order also covers refund handling and undisclosed paid endorsements.
Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.
Identity
Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.
- Websites
- https://publishing.com
- Registrations
- In the Matter of Publishing.com LLC (FTC consent agreement, April 2026)
- Jurisdictions
- United States (federal)
What was alleged
The FTC charged Publishing.com LLC and its two principals, the Mikkelsens, with misleading buyers about how much money they were likely to earn using the company’s products.
The company and its principals agreed to pay $1.5 million and to substantiate earnings claims in future.
What the order covers
The proposed order prohibits Publishing.com and the Mikkelsens from:
- making earnings claims unless the claims are not misleading and they have a reasonable basis to support them
- making the specific misrepresentations detailed in the complaint, or misrepresenting material facts in the sale of any product or service
- failing to disclose the terms of any cancellation or refund policy, or failing to promptly honour a cancellation or refund request in line with company policy
- misrepresenting endorsements and reviews
They must also disclose any unexpected material connection with endorsers or reviewers, and any payment or other incentive given for posting a review.
The Commission vote to accept the consent agreement was 2-0.
The pattern this completes
Look at what the FTC now routinely bolts on to an earnings-claim order: substantiation, refund handling, and endorsement disclosure. The same three appear here, in Publishing.com’s order, and in accessiBe’s.
That is a regulator saying these three failures travel together. In practice they do: an operation that overstates earnings usually also makes refunds difficult and buys the reviews that make the earnings claim look credible.
For a buyer the useful version is a sequence of three questions before paying. What is the basis for that earnings figure. What exactly is the refund policy and who has actually collected on it. Who paid for the testimonials.
What is not established
A consent order resolves allegations without any admission or finding of wrongdoing. At the time of writing the order was proposed and subject to a public comment period before the Commission decides whether to finalise it.
We have not yet contacted Publishing.com or the named principals for comment. When we do, the attempt and any response will appear on this entry.
Sources
Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.
- Enforcement action April 13, 2026
Right of reply
If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.
Other coaching & business opportunity entries
See all coaching & business opportunity entries, or browse the full record.
First recorded July 31, 2026 · Last updated July 31, 2026