RCG Advances, LLC
Also known as: Richmond Capital Group, LLC, Viceroy Capital Funding, Ram Capital Funding.
The FTC alleged that RCG Advances misrepresented merchant cash advance terms, made unauthorized withdrawals, and used unfair collection practices. Court orders later imposed industry bans, redress, and civil penalties.
Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.
Identity
Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.
- Registrations
- FTC v. RCG Advances, LLC (FTC case 192-3252, 2020)
- Locations
- New York
- Jurisdictions
- United States (federal)
Merchant cash advance action produced bans and monetary orders
RCG Advances, LLC, formerly Richmond Capital Group, provided merchant cash advances to small businesses and other organizations. The FTC alleged that since at least 2015 the defendants misrepresented financing terms, required personal guarantees after claiming they would not, withheld poorly disclosed upfront fees, and withdrew money from customers’ accounts without authorization. The complaint also alleged unfair collection practices, including threats of physical violence.
The FTC filed its complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2020. A 2022 court order agreed to by RCG Advances and Robert Giardina permanently banned them from the business financing and debt collection industries. It required an upfront payment of $1.5 million and a later payment of more than $1.2 million, described by the FTC as more than $2.7 million for consumer refunds.
The case continued against Jonathan Braun, who controlled RCG Advances. A court granted summary judgment to the FTC and permanently banned Braun from the merchant cash advance and debt collection industries. After a January 2024 jury trial, the court entered a judgment of $3,421,067 to redress harm to small businesses and imposed $16,956,000 in civil penalties. The jury found that Braun knowingly violated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act by deceiving small businesses about the funding defendants would provide and collect.
What is not established
The RCG Advances and Giardina order was agreed to settle the case, and the supplied releases do not state that they admitted wrongdoing. The later jury finding and monetary judgment concerned Braun.
Sources
Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.
- Enforcement action June 10, 2020
- Enforcement action January 5, 2022
- Enforcement action June 6, 2022
- Enforcement action October 30, 2023
- Enforcement action February 14, 2024
Right of reply
If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.
Other b2b services entries
See all b2b services entries, or browse the full record.
First recorded June 10, 2020 · Last updated February 14, 2024