Nonprofit Management LLC
Also known as: Tested Green.
The FTC alleged that Tested Green sold environmental certifications for up to $549.95 without testing anything, claimed 45,000 certifications issued, and cited endorsements from two organizations its own owner controlled.
Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.
Identity
Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.
- Registrations
- In the Matter of Nonprofit Management LLC, d/b/a Tested Green (FTC File No. 1023064, 2011)
- Other handles
- testedgreen.com
- Jurisdictions
- United States (federal)
Certifications with no test behind them
Between February 2009 and April 2010, Tested Green sold environmental certifications through its website and mass emails, describing itself as “the nation’s leading certification program with over 45,000 certifications in the United States.”
According to the FTC’s complaint, Tested Green never tested any of the companies it certified. It would certify anyone willing to pay, at $189.95 for a “Rapid” certification or $549.95 for a “Pro” certification. Buyers received a logo and a link to a “certification verification page” they could use to advertise their certified status.
The FTC charged that by supplying those logos and pages, the respondents provided the means to deceive consumers further down the line.
The endorsements it owned
Tested Green cited endorsements from the National Green Business Association and the National Association of Government Contractors, presented as independent organizations. Both were owned and operated by Tested Green’s own owner, Jeremy Ryan Claeys.
Why this one matters beyond its size
Seals and certifications exist because most buyers cannot evaluate an environmental claim themselves. As the FTC’s Bureau Director put it, legitimate seals are “a useful tool that can help consumers choose where to place their trust.” A certification sold without testing does not just mislead its buyer, it degrades the value of every genuine seal alongside it.
The order
The respondents may not misrepresent that an outside party has evaluated something on environmental grounds, that they or a third party have expertise to make such an evaluation, the number of certifications issued, or that anything is endorsed by any person or organization. They must disclose any connection to an endorser. The order runs 20 years.
What is not established
A consent order is for settlement purposes only and is not an admission that the law was violated. The supplied document states no monetary relief.
Sources
Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.
- Enforcement action January 11, 2011
Right of reply
If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.
Other b2b services entries
See all b2b services entries, or browse the full record.
First recorded January 11, 2011 · Last updated January 11, 2011