Workado, LLC

Also known as: Content at Scale AI.

Workado advertised its AI Content Detector as 98 percent accurate at telling whether text was written by AI or a human. Independent testing put it at 53 percent on general-purpose content. The FTC order requires evidence before any future accuracy claim, and required Workado to email its own customers.

1Official action

Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.

Identity

Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.

Websites
https://workado.com
Registrations
In the Matter of Workado, LLC, also f/k/a Content at Scale AI (FTC administrative proceeding, 2025)
Locations
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Jurisdictions
United States (federal)

98 percent claimed. 53 percent measured.

Workado, an Arizona company formerly known as Content at Scale AI, sold an AI Content Detector advertised as predicting with 98 percent accuracy whether a piece of text was written by a generative AI system such as ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, or Bard.

According to the FTC’s administrative complaint, independent testing put the accuracy on general-purpose content at 53 percent.

That is the entire case, and it needs no interpretation. A detector at 53 percent on general text is, for practical purposes, a coin toss with a subscription fee.

What the FTC alleged

That the 98 percent claim was false, misleading, or unsubstantiated, in violation of the FTC Act.

The order

Workado is prohibited from making any representation about the effectiveness of a covered product unless the claim is not misleading and the company holds competent and reliable evidence sufficient in quantity, quality, and timeliness to support it at the time it is made. It must retain that evidence.

“Covered product” is defined broadly: any product incorporating technology that detects or purports to detect content, text or images, generated or altered in whole or part by artificial intelligence.

Workado must also file compliance reports one year after issuance and annually for three years after that. The order runs for 20 years.

The part worth reading twice

The order required Workado to email its own customers and tell them what happened. The prescribed notice says, in the company’s own voice, that it claimed a 98% accuracy rate and that the FTC says it did not have proof to back that up.

Requiring a company to inform the people it sold to, in plain language, is a sharper remedy than the money in most of these cases. Any vendor quoting an accuracy figure should assume that standard could apply to them.

The Commission vote to issue the complaint and accept the consent agreement was 3-0.

What is not established

A consent order resolves allegations without any admission or finding of wrongdoing.

We have not yet contacted Workado for comment. When we do, the attempt and any response will appear on this entry.

Sources

Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.

  1. Enforcement action April 28, 2025
    FTC Order Requires Workado to Back Up Artificial Intelligence Detection Claims
  2. Court filing April 28, 2025
    Decision and Order, In the Matter of Workado, LLC (full text, including the required customer notice)

Right of reply

No contact has been logged for this entry yet.

If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.

Other ai & automation entries

See all ai & automation entries, or browse the full record.


First recorded July 31, 2026 · Last updated July 31, 2026