CarePatrol, Inc.

The FTC alleged that CarePatrol told families it graded and pre-screened senior care facilities when in most states listed on its website it had graded none, and did not have consultants in every state. It settled under a 20 year consent order.

1Official action

Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.

Identity

Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.

Registrations
In the Matter of CarePatrol, Inc. (FTC administrative proceeding 112-3155, 2012)
Jurisdictions
United States (federal)

A grade that was never assigned

CarePatrol offered families free help placing a relative in long-term senior care, and was paid by the facilities for the placements. It operated through franchises in 12 states.

Its marketing said: “We Grade Each and Every Facility From ‘A’ to ‘F’ Based on Their Last State Survey. Our Local Senior Care Consultants also Pre-Screen every home we recommend.” It also said its advisors look “beyond the chandeliers and fancy lobbies to monitor each community’s care history and state violations.”

According to the FTC’s administrative complaint, in most states listed on CarePatrol’s website the company had not monitored or graded any facilities. It did not operate through senior care consultants in every state, and in numerous instances it did not grade facilities against the most recent state inspection reports.

Why the scale matters

The complaint notes there are at least 39,000 assisted living facilities in the United States, plus thousands of smaller residential care homes. A claim to grade each and every one of them is a claim about an enormous amount of work, made to people choosing care for a parent, largely on trust.

The order

Under a proposed consent order running 20 years, CarePatrol is barred from making false or unsubstantiated representations about its placement services. The Commission vote was 5-0. This was among the FTC’s first cases against internet based senior care placement services.

What is not established

A consent order is for settlement purposes only and is not an admission that the law was violated. The administrative complaint is not a finding or ruling.

Sources

Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.

  1. Enforcement action September 17, 2012
    Two Online Placement Services for Senior Care Centers Settle FTC Charges

Right of reply

No contact has been logged for this entry yet.

If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.

Other b2b services entries

See all b2b services entries, or browse the full record.


First recorded September 17, 2012 · Last updated September 17, 2012