Zurixx, LLC
Also known as: Dorado Marketing and Management, LLC, Zurixx Financial, LLC.
The FTC and Utah alleged that Zurixx used television flipping celebrities to fill free events that sold $1,997 workshops and upsells to $41,297, and told attendees to open credit cards citing income they expected to earn later.
Resolved. Refunded, settled, ceased operating, or the claim did not hold up. Kept for the record.
Identity
Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.
- Registrations
- FTC and Utah Division of Consumer Protection v. Zurixx, LLC, et al. (FTC case 182-3063, D. Utah, 2019)
- Locations
- Utah
- Jurisdictions
- United States (federal) · Utah
The funnel
Zurixx sold coaching on buying, renovating and reselling houses, a practice known as flipping. Its advertising featured endorsements from television personalities including Tarek and Christina El Moussa of “Flip or Flop”, Hilary Farr of “Love It or List It”, and Peter Souhleris and Dave Seymour of “Flipping Boston”, inviting people to free events promising to teach them to profit “using other people’s money.”
The free event was a sales presentation for a three-day workshop costing $1,997. Attendees were told the workshop would teach them everything needed to make substantial income. Presenters at the workshop then described it as merely a “beginner” course, while selling further products and services costing as much as $41,297.
The credit card instruction
This is the part that separates Zurixx from an ordinary overpriced seminar. Presenters routinely directed attendees to obtain new credit cards or raise the limits on existing ones, ostensibly to finance real estate deals.
They allegedly told attendees to give card issuers income figures significantly higher than their actual income, on the basis of the income they were expected to earn later from investing. Presenters then suggested using that new credit to pay Zurixx for advanced training.
Silencing complaints
Zurixx allegedly required some consumers who received a refund to sign agreements barring them from speaking with the FTC, state attorneys general and other regulators, from complaining to the Better Business Bureau, and from posting negative reviews. That drew charges under the Consumer Review Fairness Act.
The settlement
The defendants are permanently banned from marketing or selling any real estate or business coaching programme, from misleading earnings claims, and from contract terms restricting reviews or contact with law enforcement.
Judgments total more than $111 million: $104.7 million against the corporate defendants, now defunct and in receivership with roughly $5 million in remaining assets, plus $2.33 million against each of the three owners and their associated entities. Approximately $12 million goes to consumer redress.
In July 2024 the FTC sent more than $12 million to 25,563 consumers.
As Utah’s Division of Consumer Protection director put it, the recovered funds are “pennies on the dollar when compared to the harm done.”
What is not established
A stipulated final order resolves the allegations without any admission or finding of wrongdoing.
Sources
Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.
- Enforcement action October 4, 2019
- Enforcement action May 20, 2020
- Enforcement action February 16, 2022
- Enforcement action July 31, 2024
- Enforcement action July 31, 2024
Right of reply
If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.
Other coaching & business opportunity entries
See all coaching & business opportunity entries, or browse the full record.
First recorded October 4, 2019 · Last updated July 31, 2024