Traffic Jam Events, LLC
The FTC found that Traffic Jam Events sent mailers styled as COVID-19 stimulus documents, complete with a mock check and the Great Seal, and promised cash prizes people had not won. It is banned from the auto industry for 20 years.
Disputed. The operator has responded. Their reply is published alongside the entry, unedited.
Identity
Published so you can confirm this entry refers to the party you are checking, and not to somebody who shares a name.
- Registrations
- In the Matter of Traffic Jam Events, LLC and David J. Jeansonne II (FTC case 202-3127, opinion and order October 2021)
- Jurisdictions
- United States (federal)
Mail dressed as a government stimulus payment
Traffic Jam Events sent mailings designed to look like official COVID-19 relief correspondence. They carried lines such as “IMPORTANT COVID-19 ECONOMIC STIMULUS DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED,” displayed the likeness of the Great Seal of the United States, and contained a mock check labeled “Stimulus Relief Program.”
The sales they led to were not part of any government program. The Commission found the practices deceptive and unfair.
The prizes that were not won
Separately, the company sent direct mail indicating recipients had won specific valuable prizes, such as $2,500 or $5,000 cash, collectable at a car dealership. On arriving, people learned they had not won it.
The Commission’s opinion quotes a consumer who drove an hour to reach a dealer and reported: “Walked in for money, came out with bootlegged airpods.”
The Commission noted the company and its owner persisted despite three prior consent orders with state authorities that had already identified their advertising as deceptive.
The lending violation
The mailers also violated the Truth in Lending Act. They prominently quoted monthly payments for buying a vehicle on credit while omitting, or burying in small print, the financing terms the law requires so a buyer can work out what the loan actually costs.
The order
Traffic Jam Events and David J. Jeansonne II are banned from advertising, selling or leasing automobiles for 20 years, barred from misrepresenting any material fact while marketing any product or service of any kind, and from further TILA violations.
What is not established
This was a litigated Commission decision on summary decision rather than a settlement. The respondents have petitioned the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for review of the Commission’s opinion and order, so the outcome was under challenge as of the supplied documents.
Sources
Every claim above rests on one of these. Open them and check.
- Enforcement action January 28, 2022
- Enforcement action January 28, 2022
Right of reply
If you are named here and something is wrong, dispute this entry. There is no charge, the route never expires, and your response is published unedited.
Other marketing & creative entries
See all marketing & creative entries, or browse the full record.
First recorded January 28, 2022 · Last updated January 28, 2022